Page 455 - NIXBOOK
P. 455

upright quickly is a good indicator the dog was suddenly caught a whiff of drugs nearby. Closed mouth sniffing is also an
        indicator he’s on to something. Individual dogs have their own unique indicators, and their handler being able to recognize
        those is what makes the dog and the handler a good K9 Unit.

        I trained with a lot of other K9 handlers from other departments, and I got hooked up with some Border Patrol agents and their
        dogs who worked out of the Port Angeles office. Their main job there was to work the ferries that went back and forth to Canada
        and keep the drug trafficking to a minimum. The agent in charge there was one of the state certifying officials, so not only did
        he train Kilo and I some more and help us practice, he was the guy who tested us several months later when we had logged the
        required 200 training hours.














        The  state’s  certification  test  was  interesting:  it  involved  searching  rooms,  then  luggage,  and  then  cars.  Over  the  years  the
        standards and protocols had been established and revised to make it fair and incontestable in court. For example, in the old
        days the instructors would tell the handlers “We’ve hidden ten baggies of drugs in these hotel rooms,” and they’d point out
        which rooms where involved, usually like 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 rooms. (The instructors would find cooperative hotels who would let
        them use some vacant rooms before housekeeping got to them) And then the handlers would go in and have their dogs find the
        drugs. But some rooms would have no drugs in them, and some rooms might have two or three stashed in them. So occasionally,
        more than few handlers would search, say, 9 rooms, find 9 drug stashes, and then rightfully conclude that the 10th room would
        have the 10th stash. But in fact, that last room would sometimes be empty, and that 10th stash was in fact back in room number
        7 hidden under the couch, in addition to the stash hidden behind the TV. This kind of a scenario would then commonly result
        in the handlers, in frustration and sometimes near panic, becoming convinced that there must that missing stash was in the last
        room and so then they’d work their dogs so much in there that the dogs would then pick up on the anxiety and get tired and
        then they’d finally just alert on any slightest smelly thing in the room in an attempt to appease their handler, but of course there
        were no actual drugs there, and so they’d fail that test for missing a stash, and for making a “false alert.” Over the years a solution
        was finally reached, and the new standard was the instructors would advise the handlers “You got 7 rooms to search. Some may
        be empty, some may have two or three hides, and we’re not gonna tell you what the total number of hidden drug stashes is.”
        That system turned out to work much better. The instructors would make it as random as possible, even rolling dice to come
        up  with  numbers  about  how  many  hides,  and  which  rooms  got  how  many,  and  even  which  room  to  start  in  first.  So  the
        randomness of it meant that sometimes there would be several rooms in a row that were “clean” – which I can personally attest
        is very disconcerting to clear 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 rooms in a row without finding anything, because self-doubt really starts coming in
        after the 3rd room when the dog has found nothing at all.

        The luggage search test is a standard; dogs that work at airports of course search luggage all day long so that one is pretty basic:
        A dozen pieces of different kinds of luggage are lined up, and one or more have drugs hidden in them. Kilo usually aced that
        part of the test.

        The last part is searching cars. Typically done in a junkyard or a public works parking lot where there were lots of cars lined up.
        Two sets of cars would be picked out in two different parts of the lot. Some drugs would be hidden in some parts of some of the
        cars by some instructors, who would then leave. Another instructor would later check in the K9 unit that was being tested. That
        instructor would not know what has been hidden, nor has he even seen the cars, and he will not be present for the searching.
        All he would do is flip a coin and then point the K9 team to one part of the lot or the other. Because the instructors had learned
        that when they were physically present to grade the exercise, the dogs and or handlers would either subconsciously or knowingly
        be able to intuit where some of the hides were. I was able to start figuring that out all by myself during all the practicing and
        training I did, pretty early on even. For example, the instructors or experienced handlers would hide some drugs in a big room,
        and then when they let in the K9 in there that was training, they’d position themselves in a place where they could easily observe
        the dog’s changes of behavior and final alert. So for example, when I was practicing in say, an old school, and we’d go into room
        after room, if the instructors stayed out in the hallway on the third room, then that was a pretty clear indication to me that the
        third room was going to be empty “blank” with nothing hidden in it. But when an instructor followed us into a room and
        stationed themselves in a certain part of the room, then I’d get a clue that something was hidden in a general area. And, based
        on where the instructors were looking, I’d get another clue about the general area. So then of course I’d start to really watch to
   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460